Views, developed by Substance, has been a familiar fixture in the UK non-profit and sports-for-development sectors for over a decade. Built to help charities demonstrate compliance and track participant attendance, it provides structured modules for logging sessions, managing group rotas and submitting standardized reports for major grant-making bodies.

However, as social sector delivery evolves, organizations often find that rigid database structures create operational friction. Customizing survey questions, automating participant communications, or connecting data to modern external tools often requires bespoke developer requests or manual workarounds in Excel. Bridging the gap between legacy compliance reporting and dynamic service management generally involves three steps: adopting a self-serve platform where fields can be modified instantly, connecting participant activity directly to automated messaging workflows and generating visual reporting dashboards without administrative delay.

‍

In-Depth: Makerble vs. Views by Substance

1. Self-serve flexibility vs. fixed system structures

• Views by Substance: Built on structured, standardized database schemas. Customizing form fields, adding unique project metrics, or altering workflow structures often requires administrative support or consultancy requests from Substance.
• Makerble: Fully self-serve. Through a visual, no-code Designer and dynamic Fields Library, non-technical administrators can create custom data points, modify survey forms, and deploy new tracking logic in minutes without additional fees.

‍

‍

2. Open integrations vs. closed ecosystems

• Views by Substance: Operates primarily as a standalone repository. Transferring data between Views and third-party CRMs, communication tools or business intelligence software usually involves manual CSV exports and imports.
• Makerble: Features an open ecosystem with native data portability. Organizations can connect Makerble to external platforms using automated APIs, spreadsheet import/export and MCP endpoints which allow you to connect your data to Microsoft Copilot, Claude and more, ensuring data moves seamlessly across operational systems.

‍

‍

3. Integrated participant engagement vs. passive data logging

• Views by Substance: Focuses on passive data collection where staff record attendance and outcomes post-session. It lacks native 2-way messaging and automated participant interaction tools.
• Makerble: Includes built-in 2-way SMS and email workflows. Program leaders can send automated reminders, deploy text-based surveys, and engage participants directly, turning data collection into a two-way relationship.

‍

‍

4. Real-time data exploration vs. static compliance reporting

• Views by Substance: Tailored for structured grant reporting and periodic compliance audits. Generating non-standard visual charts or exploring cross-project trends requires navigating complex internal reporting menus.
• Makerble: Provides real-time visual dashboards, progress meters, and shareable Albums out of the box. Teams act as "data explorers," visualizing distance travelled and project health instantly as frontline staff enter updates.

‍

Feature-by-feature comparison table

‍

On Makerble, program tracking functions as a living, open workspace. Rather than locking data into rigid, pre-defined templates, Makerble allows teams to adjust forms, add custom indicators, and configure participant profiles self-serve using our visual Designer tool and central Fields Library.

‍

Data entry is designed around frontline efficiency. Case workers and session leaders log attendances, case notes, and survey outcomes directly from any web browser or our native Android app. Incoming data automatically updates individual participant timelines and aggregates into multi-project 'albums' giving program managers and leadership instant visibility into live targets without exporting raw files or waiting for batch data processing.

‍

‍

Already committed to Views? Use the best of both.

If your organisation is mandated by a primary funder to report through Views by Substance, you can still use Makerble to power your daily operations:

• Use Makerble for Frontline Service & Engagement: Deploy Makerble for caseworkers, session leaders, and volunteers who need mobile offline access, 2-way SMS communication, and real-time visual tracking of participant progress.
• Use Views for Funder Compliance Storage: Export aggregated quarterly outcomes and session logs from Makerble via CSV to fulfill specific funder filing requirements in Views.
• The Result: Frontline staff gain an intuitive, flexible workspace that drives daily delivery, while leadership satisfies traditional sector reporting obligations.

‍

Which system is right for you?

• Choose Views by Substance if: Your primary requirement is adhering strictly to standardized UK sports or community sector reporting frameworks where custom workflows, 2-way SMS engagement, and open software integrations are not required.
• Choose Makerble if: You need an open, flexible impact and case management platform that empowers teams to customize forms self-serve, engage participants directly, capture data offline, and view real-time visual progress across all programs.

You can get started on Makerble today using our accessible free tier and expand your configuration as your team grows.

‍